Why a Lot of Digital Magazine Surveys Suck

August 11, 2010 by  

I was interviewed at length about my frequent complaining about digital magazine studies like this one and this one that report what readers say they do compared to what they actually do.

Most dismaying, perhaps, is that the links I’ve provided aren’t to the studies but to the major news outlets who considered the data accurate enough to be published.

It’s interesting – we’re a Google advertiser and I get a lot of surveys from Google asking me about their service, with lots and lots of questions. But not one of these questions asks me things that Google already knows the answer to: they don’t ask about CTR, page views, etc. They do ask about what my experience is as an advertiser and those are good questions. But to ask about things that data can confirm (or, more likely, refute) in a heartbeat is just silly.

Disclaimer: the interviewer is Peter Houston, who works for a Nxtbook customer, though in point of fact I don’t think he ever personally chose to work with Nxtbook, though I do hope we make it easy to do so. 

Comments

One Response to “Why a Lot of Digital Magazine Surveys Suck”

  1. Peter Houston on August 17th, 2010 6:51 am

    Hey Marcus,

    You make it sound like I was press ganged into working with NXTBook :) Not a bit of it. Like all the good suppliers in this market you are incredibly open, willing to listen and quick to respond with practical advice that goes beyond your own short-term gain.

    Keep it coming

    Peter

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!